[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [TCML] Still stuck at 36"
Hi John,
I don't recall if I made a careful performance comparison between the sucker and vortex gaps. At the time I was changing a lot of things on my coil, and probably since spark measurement is so subjective, I chose to just focus on the more quantitative gap loss measurements, which were unequivocal. See http://www.laushaus.com/tesla/vortexgap.htm
So unresolved is whether quenching differences between sucker and pressurized gaps might offset the lower losses seen in the blown gaps. But if I had to guess, I would guess that the blown/vortex/hyperbaric gap would have superior performance. It's just a bit more difficult to build than a sucker gap.
Regards, Gary Lau
MA, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of futuret@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 1:08 PM
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [TCML] Still stuck at 36"
>
> Theoretically, a sucker gap may work better if built as a pressurized
> gap.
> In such case it won't be a sucker gap of course.
> Dr. R's hyperbaric gap is probably a pressure gap, not a sucker
> gap. After all, the word "hyperbaric" means "higher than normal
> atmospheric pressure. By using a pressurized air gap, this should help
> reduce gap
> losses since pressurized air breaks down at a narrower gap setting
> than lower pressure air. Also pressurized air should quench better
> than lower pressure air. Just run the vacuum motor in reverse
> to produce the pressurized air. This is the concept Gary Lau
> used in his vortex gap. I remember that Gary used a sucker
> gap at first then switched to the vortex pressurized gap, but
> I don't remember if he saw a noticeable improvement in
> spark length. Perhaps Gary will comment.
>
> John
> --
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Tuck <follies@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 4:07 am
> Subject: [TCML] Still stuck at 36"
>
>
>
> Hello.
> If you do go for a sucker gap as Dr R suggests, the 'normal' distance
> for a
> gap may not always apply. After some head scratching I found out that
> the
> vacuum that is created, alters the normal spark distance. (I'm now
> using 10K
> / 100ma on a 192 thou or 4.9mm gap)
>
> If I forget to start the suction (semi-industrial vac cleaner) my gap
> will
> only start if the Variac is set around 220 volts (I'm UK based at
> 240volts)
> , whereas with the suction on, it will start at about 130 volts and you
> can
> go as low as 90 volts running. I found you need good suction, vac
> cleaner or
> leaf vacuum cleaner (not a leaf blower) If you build it bigger than you
> need
> you have capability for adding another NST as well. :-).
>
> Phil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> Of tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: 25 January 2009 05:09
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Tesla Digest, Vol 15, Issue 33
>
> Send Tesla mailing list submissions to
> tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> tesla-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> "Re: Contents of Tesla digest..."
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.13/1914 - Release Date:
> 24/01/2009
> 20:40
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla