[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [TCML] RE: FAQ
Ok I feel I need to interject here.
I am without a doubt a N00b at this. I have built a criminally ineffcient coil many year ago and would like to construct another. Only this time I would like to design it.
ANY information be it FAQ, threads, web pages, anything is great for the thirsty mind. An area of concise information woul dbe great, and it does not even have to be a faq. What if it was a page full of links to the Tesla Mailing lists greatest threads?
Anyway being a n00b I was pondering the statement of having a secondary resonate to a 1/4 wavelength and was wondering why #1 is viewed as a correct statement?
Homepage
http://home.comcast.net/~mikethompson236/index.htm
--- On Fri, 7/17/09, Dex Dexter <dexterlabs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Dex Dexter <dexterlabs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [TCML] RE: FAQ
To: "Tesla Coil Mailing List" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, July 17, 2009, 7:07 AM
Regarding point #4 I wouldn't go above 100 W coil under NO CIRCUMSTANCES!
I described in my earlier post in conversation with Peter Terren my experiment "Ala Brent Turner" with only 50 W input to tesla coil.
Result?Lot of unpleasant sensations and little shocks in my hand as I directed 3" arc to water pipe.
Now imagine power like 1500 W and the same situation.Me gonner I think.
Ok,people differ by their tolerance to receiving shocks but I am taking from my perspective.
And the main problem in point #4 isn't that but explanation.Small currents and skin effects when humans are conductors.Rubish.
Dex
--- Gary.Lau@xxxxxx wrote:
From: "Lau, Gary" <Gary.Lau@xxxxxx>
To: Tesla Coil Mailing List <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:
Subject: RE: [TCML] RE: FAQ
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:23:57 +0000
That WOULD be useful! Only trouble is, often enough, one man's myth is another's religion. I can see a LOT of bandwidth being expended here, trying to reach consensus! Fer instance, to your point #4, surely there is a coil small enough that it is thoroughly safe to touch. But who among us can state what that threshold is?
Of course your point is largely valid and should be included among the many coiling myths. My point is that there's a lot of wordsmithing and revising that will need to happen.
Regards, Gary Lau
MA, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Dex Dexter
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 3:57 PM
> To: Tesla Coil Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [TCML] RE: FAQ
>
> And what about list like:Myths and misconceptions surrounding tesla coils we can
> often read and hear about?
> To start with,my top 5 myths are:
> 1.Lenght of the secondary wire should be 1/4 wavelenght of the resonant
> frequency.
>
> 2.Voltage step-up can be computed by the ratio of the number of secondary to
> primary turns.
>
> 3.Output potential of coils can be determined by output spark lenght.
>
> 4.Tesla coil sparks are safe to "touch" (very weak currents and skin effect bad
> arguments).
>
> 5.Magnifiers are much more efficient then classical coils and generate higher
> potentials.
>
>
>
> To compose list of Top 50 myths might be lot of fun I guess.
>
> Dex
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_____________________________________________________________
Washington DC's Largest FREE Email service. ---> http://www.DCemail.com ---> A Washington Online Community Member --->
http://www.DCpages.com
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla