Neal.Ps. What would your other reasons for not using aluminum be, if not the resistance/frequency issues?
DC,I have refuted this oft-repeated but mistaken belief of yours that aluminum exhibits some frequency-dependant resistance, several times in the past and I will continue to do so. It does not, to any significant degree. I have made frequency-sweep measurements of the AC resistance for many different conductor geometries, including Al vs. Cu. Of course the aluminum has a higher resistance than copper, but this is due to the intrinsic resistively difference between them and is NOT frequency dependant for the frequencies that we are interested in. If the aluminum conductor diameter is scaled up to compensate for the higher resistively, it's a wash.
There are many good reasons to choose copper conductors over aluminum and I wouldn't use anything but copper myself, but frequency-dependant resistance is not one of them. Please either supply quantitative evidence of your claim, or stop propagating this myth.
To Neal's question - Primary resistance is a very bad thing for Tesla coils. Every (reasonable) effort should be made to minimize tank circuit resistance, if you're going for maximum performance (and not everyone is).
Regards, Gary Lau MA, USA
-----Original Message----- From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DC Cox Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 5:54 PM To: Tesla Coil Mailing List Subject: Re: [TCML] primary tubing At RF frequencies aluminum is a poor conductor as compared to copper. Usecopper for HF applications. Alum will limit your peak RF current, something you don't want to do. Peak RF current determines peak magnetic field whichof course links all your power into the sec inductor. Dr. Resonance
_______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla