Re: [TCML] SRSG vs. RQSG

["Teslalabor" <teslalabor@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Brandon,

YES there was an ultimative increase in performance when I changed from my 
stationary gap (even cooled with pressurized air) to 200BPS SRSG. You sould 
invest your money in building a SRSG!

Stefan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brandon Hendershot" <brandonhendershot@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Tesla Coil Mailing List" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 5:11 AM
Subject: [TCML] SRSG vs. RQSG


> Hi All,
>
> I've noticed that coils with rotary spark gaps tend to throw bigger 
> brighter
> sparks than that of a typical stationary electrode gap. Going by your own
> personal experience, do you think that the different gap styles are the
> cause of better performance, or is it the 'fact' that coilers tackling the
> more advanced sparkgaps typically have better systems in the first place?
> I guess what I'm trying to ask here, is should I bother spending the money
> and effort on making a rotary spark gap, or should I stick with my 
> quenched
> Richard Quick spark gap? Were there any huge increases in performance when
> those of you switched?
>
> Thanks again everyone,
> Brandon
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla 

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla