Re: [TCML] JAVATC

[Tim Flood <tfloodrr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Phil.

I double checked, and everything was input OK. However, I decreased the
secondary number of turns and one gauge smaller wire and the toroid in the
drawing is where it belongs.(?) The spark length under Power calculated at
107", which I thought wasn't bad using a PT.

Any other thoughts will be appreciated.

Thank you,

Tim


On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Phil Tuck <phil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Tim,
> In the section titled "Top Load Objects", check your "Toroid Centre Height"
> entry, in the first, of the four differant differant types of toroid
> choices.
> Also make sure you've not mixed units (inches & centimrtres)
>
>
> Phil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Tim Flood
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 9:58 PM
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [TCML] JAVATC
>
> When running the numbers and finally ending up with a very good RSG Spark
> length, the small drawing Under the Primary Output Data shows the toroid
> located about a third of the way down from the top of the secondary.
>
> Why? I'm probably missing something  obvious.
>
> Thanks for any advice.
>
> Tim Flood
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla