[Home][2018 Index] Re: [TCML] Hockey Puck SCR as spark gap replacement [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] Hockey Puck SCR as spark gap replacement



On 12/4/18 11:24 PM, Greg Peters wrote:
Hi all,

I know this has been discussed before but forget why it was dismissed. Can
someone remind me?


I think the IGBT approach was found superior -

SCRs are unidirectional, and don't switch very fast.
You'd need back to back SCRs.

Sort of like the use of a hydrogen thyratron (which has also been tried.. they're fast to turn on, not as fast to quench)



There's also the voltage issue - you'd need to stack them to get the voltage you need for a NST.


I think that observation is what drove the initial "off line tesla coils" - using the rectified power line as a several hundred volt DC bus, then using commercial power semiconductors - I seem to recall that some folks did start with SCRs, but then IGBTs (which are much faster) took over, and the rest is history with the DRSSTC - which is essentially a high power switching power supply with an air core transformer.


When it gets right down to it, a spark gap is a pretty inexpensive and decent way to switch high currents at 10s of kV.

Many thanks,

Greg
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla


_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla