[Home][2018 Index]
Daniel,Total speculation, but I believe Tesla intended to use another spark gap between the tertiary (assuming magnifier) and the top load. I have read references that hint that it is possible to get beat frequencies in the low Hz range using this arrangement, although the system would be running in the Khz.
Has anyone tried this ? Derek On 28/11/2018 14:24, Daniel Kunkel wrote:
Billy,02 Jan. 1900 (p. 365). Please see the very last paragraph! Teslaintended (time permitting) to build an extra coil for full power of apparatus & take pictures outside! I will have to re-read the 02 Jan entry when I get home tonight, as I don't recall that partMy question remains: How could this have been done & what would theresonant frequency be? I believe Hull gives the oscillator's values, so it would be a simple operation to swap in the additional values for the topload to determine the resultant frequency.And as a follow up, does anyone have an idea what the lowest possiblefrequency is for a Tesla coil / magnifier??? I have also wondered what frequency is the lowest practical/possible limit for a Tesla Coil. At least for a standard AC powered spark gap coil, I can't see it working efficiently below the line frequency* due to charging the capacitor and spark gap break rates. Tesla's wireless was going to need something on the 8-11Hz range, so he didn't see a problem with these low frequencies. I think the best way to make that happen would be to run the coil on DC to charge the capacitor and then use a rotary gap to discharge the cap. Are you planning on building a large low frequency magnifier? ~Dan Kansas City area *60 or 50 Hz depending on your grid...I think the supply to the Colorado Springs Lab was 133Hz _______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla