[Home][2019 Index] Re: [TCML] Primary cap behavior [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] Primary cap behavior



 Oops typo, doubling,  not halving.
Thanks Steve.


    On Thursday, September 26, 2019, 06:08:47 PM CDT, Terry Oxandale <toxandale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
 
  My interpretation of the description is that when you attach terminal two, you've paralleled another string of caps to the terminal 1 string, and in essence changed the frequency of the primary by halving the bank's capacitance. Apologies if I misread this.
ox


    On Thursday, September 26, 2019, 04:12:29 PM CDT, undisclosed recipient via Tesla <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
 
  Please pardon the crude drawing but this is the best way


terminal out 1---[cap]—[cap]—[cap]—[cap—[cap]—[cap]—[cap]—[cap]—[cap]—|  input  |—[cap]—[cap]—[cap]—[cap]—[cap]—p[cap]—[cap]—[cap]—[cap]— terminal out 2
 Each string of caps can handle 19 kV


With terminal 1 tapped onto the primary coil, it works as expected.
HOWEVER when I attach terminal 2 as well then I literally get nothing
Yet when I attach terminal 2 to the primary coil it works as expected.

any ideas?
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
  
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
  
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla