Re: ScanTesla V7.61 - V7.62 ;-) - no, thnx : D

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: dest <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>

allo : )

> Original poster: Jim Lux <James.P.Lux@jpl.###.gov>

nice e-mail btw : )

> The fact that the model resembles current thinking on what's
> actually happening with the spark is just a manifestation that such
> a model is computationally or conceptually efficient.

so all versions prior 7.62 were a crap? coz they do not reflect
reality well for my coil for example - they predicred crappy top load
for da best sparks : )

> The next step is to use the model to predict some measurements (for
> systems that aren't the ones you built the model from), go make the
> measurements, and see if it matches.

no problemo - this proggy would be the first one, against which i
would test my tesla transformer, if it would be built some day : )

> > Original poster: Vardan <vardan01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> But "right now", there is the model of "1pF/foot+220K" and the
> dynamic (the "first" dynamic) model, at least for coiler's...

> I am sort of amazed at how long and successful "1pF/foot+220K" lasted
> and still rules today (five years...)!!!

how about this:

http://www.scopeboy.com/tesla/experiment/index.html

"Using Terry Fritz's idea of a fixed resistance in series with (X pF
per foot) I get 100k + (2.7pF/foot) which is not really anything like
Terry's 220k + (1pF/foot). Are my calculations wrong? Is Terry's model
wrong? Or are Scottish streamers just thicker and hairier?"

who is rules today - Dr. Mc Steve or Terry? : ) and what was the real
reason for 100k & 2.7pico?

> The models are lumped and pretty "simple".  Please make better
> ones(!!)

> I have been waiting for a "year" to hear about it :D

and you have to wait probably one more year, coz presently i just have
started assembling winding jig for my secondary, so go figure : \
: )

> I sort of hate to be alone in the quest...

everybody are alone here - just by design ; D

-----
Let the bass kick! =:-D