Re: [TCML] Wireless Transmission Theory

[resonance@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

No, I'm not aware of any typos in the paper, just some improper science.

I'm referring to their paper on the "Slow Wave Helical Resonator".  I
don't have a copy with me in AZ so I can't tell you exactly where the
errors are.  I think Bart Anderson has a copy of this paper.

Dr. Resonance



> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 resonance@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> There were several errors in Corum's papers.
>
>
> That's not too helpful, since I bet I can find several errors in *any*
> research paper.  I'd need to know which Corum papers only had misspellings
> or bad punctuation.  Or which of their papers were entirely misguided and
> wrong.
>
> Avoid the logic fallacy of "poisoning the well," or sowing distrust but
> without saying why distrust is warrented.
>
> Their papers about slow-wave waveguides and 1/4-wave waveguide stubs
> should be fairly easy to verify with a pulse generator and a couple feet
> of wire-wrapped pipe.  But the waveguide concept itself is certainly
> correct, since single-wire G-lines are real.  And since TC secondaries do
> actually have multiple higher modes, just as we'd expect if the coils
> behaved as waveguides having end reflections.
>
>
> (((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))
> William J. Beaty                http://staff.washington.edu/wbeaty/
> beaty chem washington edu       Research Engineer
> billbamascicom                  UW Chem Dept,  Bagley Hall RM74
> 206-543-6195                    Box 351700, Seattle, WA 98195-1700
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>


Dr. Resonance

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla